Song Downloads free essay sample

Download: â€Å"Heartless† by Kanye West Hip-Hop/Rap artist Kanye West certainly outdid himself when he released his new single â€Å"Heartless,† which fans of his previous work should certainly download. Similar to his last single â€Å"Love Lockdown,† West showcases an edgier voice, which sounds as though he’s singing into a fan. Although some listeners may not find this techno-sounding voice appealing, West’s lyrics are another aspect of it to look forward to hearing. West demonstrates a sense of vulnerability through this single, which he doesn’t normally express through his actions in the media or through lyrics in his other songs such as â€Å"Gold Digger.† â€Å"Heartless† is about a girl who breaks up with a guy, â€Å"but in the end it’s still so lonely† for the guy. The girl then attempts to get back together with him; however, the guy then says to her, â€Å"You can’t make it right, I’m gon’ take off tonight. We will write a custom essay sample on Song Downloads or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page † West’s new single displays new sounds, a new beat, and a new theme in his songs that will thrill anyone who downloads it and enjoys this edgy version of hip-hop and choose to download it. Download: â€Å"The Stoop† by Little Jackie â€Å"The Stoop† by pop artist Little Jackie may not be a well-known tune; however, it’s unquestionably one that pop music lovers should download. Little Jackie’s song on her album â€Å"The Stoop† is very upbeat, causing listeners to be in a happier mood. One of the main instruments includes a piano, Although the beat of Little Jackie’s song is very uplifting, the rhymes in her lyrics add to the general appeal of the song as well. Rhyming lines such as, â€Å"It is what it is, it ain’t all hard up in the hood† and â€Å"Sittin’ on my front step and it’s all good,† allow Little Jackie’s tune flow well and make it an easy for listeners to listen to and follow along with. Little Jackie and her music may not be widely recognized; however, her new hit â€Å"The Stoop† makes her seem like a pop star. Download: Single Ladies by Beyonce Knowles Off her new album â€Å"I Am†¦Sasha Fierce,† R

How does Golding portray outsiders Essays

How does Golding portray outsiders Essays How does Golding portray outsiders Paper How does Golding portray outsiders Paper Essay Topic: Literature The Outsiders The way in which Golding portrays outsiders is to make them obvious characters. In fact the first notable characters we meet are all outsiders, with one possible exception. First there is Ralph, from the start we know Ralph will be something special in the book as Golding portrays him as different. His golden body and general physical appearance set him aside from the rest of the boys. Throughout the novel, Ralph remains exempt in some way from the group. Initially he is the leader, making the decisions, calling the shots, generally he is not one of the mob. While he is acting on their behalf, he is also on a different level, the chief level, and so above them due to his authority. Secondly we are introduced to Piggy. Physically Piggy is very obviously an outsider, he has fat and ass-mar(asthma). But he is also a lot different to any of the other boys on a different level, he has an outstanding intellect. It is Piggy who devises calling the meeting, and also Piggy who has the brains behind Ralphs leadership. Very obviously Piggy is an outsider right from the first meeting, where he is dubbed first Fatty and then after prompting from Ralph Piggy. Here it is shown that he is the first true outsider, as he has no true alliances, not even with Ralph. Our third outsider is Simon. In Jacks perfectly ordered choir, Simon is the only one who faints, the only one who lets the side down, Hes always fainting. He is little respected by the rest of the group who snigger at his paleness. Simon remains throughout the book the mystic one. He is set apart by his desire to think and be alone, to philosophise and reason things out. It is whilst he is doing this that he realises the truth about the beast, and is killed trying to impart this knowledge, almost like witch trials. There are two possible outsiders with very big question marks over their heads. These are Roger and Jack. Roger is the evil force on the island, quietly evil and malevolent, but much more so than Jack. Roger sharpened a stick at both ends, and it is Roger who kills Piggy with the rock, even thought Jack does claim the kill. This sets him apart from the other boys by sheer virtue of his evil qualities. Jack is also a possible outsider as he is the main contender for Ralphs leadership, and finally the chief. He becomes the new leader, his reign of tyranny is unopposed, but would it have continued so? We dont actually know, but he was one, the ones suffering were many, in this way he becomes the outsider. When Jack does set up the second colony we are shown literally that Ralph and Piggy are outsiders. They are living at the other end of the island, away from the tribe, away from the meat and fire. They are not alone however initially there is also Samneric, but the tribe seizes them. All the outsiders also have an unfortunate tendency to die. Perhaps here Golding is trying to tell us something, about, maybe, racial disagreements. Minorities are often, though not always victimised, and perhaps that is what Golding is trying to portray here, that it is wrong, and the real barbarians are the ones doing it. One other essential thing about Goldings outsiders is that they are not really that odd. They arent murderers or insane, they are normal, if there is such a thing. They are the kind of people you meet on the street, but placed in some rather compromising circumstances. Ralph especially is the epitome of this, very normal, athletic, not especially dumb or bright, but he is a definite outsider because the society around him makes him one. This is reminiscent of both Frankenstein making his monster and Joanne Harris Chocolat in which Roux, although a fine upstanding well-intentioned person is believed to be a nasty piece of work due to his social background. Goldings message is fairly clear, what makes an outsider is the way society judges them, wether it be on their clothes, brains or physicality. It is not the outsider who needs to be wrong, but the society in which they lives needs to deem them wrong. Thus are so many perfectly good people ruined by the prejudgement of others.

Fear and trembling by Soren Kierkegaard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Fear and trembling by Soren Kierkegaard - Essay Example In his argument, he shows that objectivity falsehood can be revealed by lack of individual obligation. Fear and trembling, written by Soren Kierkegaard provides a description of two people: knight of faith and knight of infinite resignation. According to him, knight of infinite resignation refers to an individual that has had to surrender something they dearly treasure. Among such things are loved ones or a calling that can happen due to unavoidable circumstances in the current world. An Individual in the knight of infinite resignation has to reassign to stated facts and await his death as he lies with the circumstance that renders him impossible to achieve the desired object. Never the less, the individual has hope in the afterlife and still holds on without giving up. He remains hopeful that his aspirations of the commitments that are supposed to define his life will be granted in the afterlife. In his argument in knight of faith, Kierkegaard goes beyond his description of faith pe rsonalities in knight of infinite resignation. Both interpretations of faith ensure that the prospected individual has to surrender a valuable item that they treasure and is essential in providing a meaning in their lives. However, their difference is that the knight of faith has the belief that they will posses again all that they treasured and lost, an aspect identified as the absurd’s strength. He has the trust that regaining his treasured items will not have to happen in the afterlife but in the temporality life of the finite world. On the other hand, Concluding Unscientific Postscript conceives correspondence in objects and thoughts in both transitive and symmetrical ways. Kierkegaard argues that true objects could correspond to these ideas. In depth, he explains the manner in which objective truth differs from subjective truth. Explaining that objective truth is an outer truth and subjective truth an inner truth, he shows the entire writing as a philosophical method of reasoning that has the aim of gaining truth. Although Kierkegaard elaborates on faith, his interpretation in these two writings is dissimilar. Whereas Knight of faith and knight of infinite resignation provides an account of faith in requisites of conviction in the absurd, concluding unscientific postscript proves that faith is the contradiction amid vast passion of individuals’ inwardness and the purpose uncertainty. He identifies the former aspects as the only two steps that used in the development of real faith, but states in the latter that truth is all about subjectivity. Concluding unscientific postscript is explained in a major contrast of objectivity and subjectivity. Objectivity entails science, history, speculative philosophy, and they lack any relationship with the knower’s existence. Subjectivity is not inclusive of any worldly perceptions, but involves occurrences and introspections that have a single relationship with the Creator. On the other hand, knigh t of faith and the knight of infinite resignation show major aspects of freedom related to individualism in major choices of life. Kierkegaard uses the story of a lad falling and staying in love with a princess despite knowing that his expectations are impossible in showing some choices that different people make. The knight of faith presents faith in the form of a paradox that explains the difficulties involved in reconciling with logic. This is explained using the knight of faith where logic does not appear in the manner he trusts that he will gain his commitment in the present world. However, he still holds on to his belief complying with the aspect named above: the aspect of strength of the absurd. This is considered paradoxical